{"id":279924,"date":"2026-04-22T08:11:20","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T08:11:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/?p=279924"},"modified":"2026-04-22T08:11:20","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T08:11:20","slug":"law-commission-to-consider-new-consumer-class-action-regime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/law-commission-to-consider-new-consumer-class-action-regime\/","title":{"rendered":"Law Commission to consider new consumer class action regime"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

The government has set the wheels in motion for a potentially significant expansion in class actions – with an emphasis on ‘proportionate cost’. The Law Commission today announced the beginning of a project, sponsored by the Department for Business and Trade, to ‘consider the potential introduction of a consumer class actions regime’.<\/p>\n

Such a jurisdiction could operate alongside the collective action opt-out regime enabled for competition cases by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. This has attracted criticism for its high costs and paucity of compensation received by class members. According to the commission, the new project will identify the benefits and risks associated with a consumer class actions regime, ‘having regard to other available mechanisms such as public enforcement action and alternative dispute resolution’.<\/p>\n

Objectives\u00a0of any new regime would include improving consumers\u2019 access to redress – including ensuring that damages are distributed – as well as ‘promoting the efficient conduct of litigation at proportionate cost’.\u00a0The project will make recommendations as to the design of such a regime, were one to be introduced.<\/p>\n

\n

\"Department<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Work on the project is due to begin this autumn. In the meantime the Law Commission is seeking responses to an initial scoping questionnaire<\/a><\/strong>. Questions include: ‘What features should be included within the design of an opt-out consumer class actions regime to ensure that it promotes the efficient conduct of litigation at proportionate cost?’ and ‘What features should be included within the design of an opt-out consumer class actions regime to ensure that it does not promote speculative claims that are without merit?’<\/p>\n

The deadline for responses is 30 October.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

Source link <\/a>
\n\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n