{"id":41998,"date":"2018-06-20T17:13:11","date_gmt":"2018-06-20T17:13:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/?p=41998"},"modified":"2019-04-17T17:12:58","modified_gmt":"2019-04-17T17:12:58","slug":"unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/","title":{"rendered":"Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"\">\n<h4>Offering no defence<\/h4>\n<p>Over the years, a practice has developed whereby unreasonable behaviour divorce petitions are often drafted citing the minimum detail of behaviour required in order to obtain the divorce. A respondent to an unreasonable divorce petition is entitled, in their acknowledgment, to deny the truth of all of the allegations of unreasonable behaviour whilst allowing the divorce to proceed on an undefended basis. This approach is often recommended by solicitors to their clients as there is little merit in defending a divorce petition.<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A recent case where the divorce was successfully defended, and which has received a lot of media attention, is<span>\u00a0<\/span><em>Owens v Owens<\/em>.<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Mr and Mrs Owens had been married for 37 years before separating in 2015. That year Mrs Owens petitioned for divorce on the basis of Mr Owens\u2019 unreasonable behaviour. The allegations of unreasonable behaviour were of a type which are commonly made in such petitions. However, Mr Owens did not want the marriage to end and he chose to defend the divorce proceedings.<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The final hearing was before HHJ Tolson. He concluded that the marriage had indeed broken down but still found in favour of Mr Owens and dismissed Mrs Owens\u2019 divorce petition. He concluded that Mrs Owens had failed to establish that Mr Owens\u2019 behaviour had caused her to conclude that the marriage had broken down.<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Mrs Owens appealed this decision but the Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.familylaw.co.uk\/news_and_comment\/owens-v-owens-2017-ewca-civ-182\" target=\"_blank\">[2017] EWCA Civ 182<\/a>, [2018] 1 FLR 1002). She then appealed to the Supreme Court which heard the Appeal in May 2018. Her appeal was supported by Resolution, the representative body of specialist family lawyers which has long campaigned for an end to fault based divorces. A judgment is now awaited. Dependent upon the outcome of this appeal, it may be that the current approach adopted by family lawyers when drafting unreasonable behaviour divorce petitions needs to change. At the moment, an unreasonable behaviour petition in which scant details of behaviour are cited will very often be granted by a court provided no objection is raised by the respondent. In future. will the courts require far more details of unreasonable behaviour to be contained in such divorce petitions before granting the divorce?<span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h4>A call for change<\/h4>\n<p>If the Supreme Court rejects Mrs Owens\u2019 appeal, no doubt this will renew calls that Parliament should consider changing the divorce laws in England and Wales. However, for many years now, there has been no political will to change the divorce law.<\/p>\n<p>Many lawyers, including Resolution, consider the current divorce law to be totally unsatisfactory. It often involves the apportionment of blame when quite often the divorcing parties have no interest in seeking to blame each other regarding the end of their marriage. So, is there a better way by which a divorce could be granted?<\/p>\n<p>One proposal is that a divorce should be granted, regardless of whether the other party consents or not, once they have lived apart for say at least one year. This would mean divorces could be brought about relatively quickly following the breakdown of the marriage, with there being a simplified procedure which would be cheap, straightforward and involve minimal input from a lawyer. Having to wait a year would also allay the fears of some that simplifying the divorce law could lead to marriage being treated as a disposable commodity, ended as easily as it can be created. To me, it seems a sensible compromise \u2013 and would certain prevent someone like Mrs Owens being trapped in a loveless and desperately unhappy marriage for as long as she has been.\n              <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.familylaw.co.uk\/news_and_comment\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\">Source link <\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/contact-us\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer-300x100.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-14\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer-300x100.png 300w, https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer-150x50.png 150w, https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer.png 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Offering no defence Over the years, a practice has developed whereby unreasonable behaviour divorce petitions are often drafted citing the minimum detail of behaviour required in order to obtain the divorce. A respondent to an unreasonable divorce petition is entitled, in their acknowledgment, to deny the truth of all of the allegations of unreasonable behaviour &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","entry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose - Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose - Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Offering no defence Over the years, a practice has developed whereby unreasonable behaviour divorce petitions are often drafted citing the minimum detail of behaviour required in order to obtain the divorce. A respondent to an unreasonable divorce petition is entitled, in their acknowledgment, to deny the truth of all of the allegations of unreasonable behaviour &hellip; Continue reading &quot;Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-20T17:13:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-17T17:12:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"spainops\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"spainops\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/\",\"name\":\"Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose - Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"http:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer-300x100.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-20T17:13:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-17T17:12:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/bacc79b48921539cd8fc642f86d23254\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer.png\",\"width\":600,\"height\":200},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/bacc79b48921539cd8fc642f86d23254\",\"name\":\"spainops\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a2648c0ace71d8dde31f2a9e8b370b694f81d70a3ed9ccfb9ec45550a223943?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a2648c0ace71d8dde31f2a9e8b370b694f81d70a3ed9ccfb9ec45550a223943?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"spainops\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/author\/spainops\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose - Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose - Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog","og_description":"Offering no defence Over the years, a practice has developed whereby unreasonable behaviour divorce petitions are often drafted citing the minimum detail of behaviour required in order to obtain the divorce. A respondent to an unreasonable divorce petition is entitled, in their acknowledgment, to deny the truth of all of the allegations of unreasonable behaviour &hellip; Continue reading \"Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose\"","og_url":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/","og_site_name":"Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog","article_published_time":"2018-06-20T17:13:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-17T17:12:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":200,"url":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"spainops","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"spainops","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/","url":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/","name":"Unreasonable behaviour: Owens v Owens highlights that divorce law is no longer fit for purpose - Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer-300x100.png","datePublished":"2018-06-20T17:13:11+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-17T17:12:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/bacc79b48921539cd8fc642f86d23254"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/unreasonable-behaviour-owens-v-owens-highlights-that-divorce-law-is-no-longer-fit-for-purpose\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/footer.png","width":600,"height":200},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/","name":"Dominic Levent Solicitors Blog","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/bacc79b48921539cd8fc642f86d23254","name":"spainops","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a2648c0ace71d8dde31f2a9e8b370b694f81d70a3ed9ccfb9ec45550a223943?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6a2648c0ace71d8dde31f2a9e8b370b694f81d70a3ed9ccfb9ec45550a223943?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"spainops"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog"],"url":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/author\/spainops\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41998"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41998\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dominiclevent.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}